Loading prices…
🩸BEARISH

Allbridge Core drained for $1.65M in cross-chain exploit

The attacker bridged stolen funds from Solana to Ethereum, and the protocol's pause is the kind of containment move that signals a live, in-flight incident rather than a post-mortem.

Allbridge Core was exploited for roughly $1.65 million on Monday, with the attacker bridging the stolen funds from Solana to Ethereum in a single cross-chain sweep. The protocol said it has paused the bridge as a precaution and is urging affected liquidity providers to withdraw immediately.

Why it matters

Allbridge sits in the cross-chain bridge category that has historically been the single most-targeted surface in DeFi. A successful drain routed through a legitimate bridge hop to a major L1 is the worst-case pattern: the funds are now in Ethereum liquidity, harder to freeze than assets stranded on the source chain. The protocol's pause suggests the team caught the exploit in-flight rather than after the fact, but the cross-chain routing means time-to-recovery is measured in block confirmations, not hours.

Market impact

The $1.65M figure is small relative to mega-exploits but lands on top of a year in which bridge security has remained the structural weak point for institutional DeFi adoption. Affected LPs are now exposed to a multi-day withdrawal queue and a governance vote on any recovery plan. Watch the bridge's TVL trajectory over the next 24 hours; a sharp drop would confirm LPs are exiting rather than waiting for a patch.

Related tokens
$SOL $ETH

Frequently asked questions

  1. How much was stolen in the Allbridge Core exploit?

    Roughly $1.65 million was drained from Allbridge Core, with the attacker bridging the stolen funds from Solana to Ethereum.

  2. What has Allbridge done in response to the exploit?

    Allbridge paused the protocol as a precaution and urged affected liquidity providers to withdraw immediately.

  3. Why is bridging stolen funds from Solana to Ethereum significant?

    Once funds land in Ethereum liquidity through a legitimate bridge hop, they become harder to freeze than assets stranded on the source chain, accelerating the time-to-recovery problem.

  4. How does this compare to previous bridge exploits?

    The dollar figure is small relative to mega-exploits, but bridges have historically been the single most-targeted surface in DeFi, making the category itself a recurring structural risk.

  5. What should affected liquidity providers expect next?

    Affected LPs face a multi-day withdrawal queue and a likely governance vote on any recovery plan, with TVL trajectory over the next 24 hours the key signal of whether they are exiting or holding for a patch.

Source attribution
Aggregated from CoinTelegraph · Verified · Last refreshed 18h ago
Open original →