Loading prices…
🩸BEARISH

CLARITY Act Hits Wall in Senate Over Stablecoin Rewards Dispute

The Senate's market-structure bill is hung up on a narrow fight over yield-bearing stablecoins, but the deadlock is holding back the framework for spot, custody, and disclosure rules that touch every…

The Senate's CLARITY Act — the long-awaited US market-structure bill for digital assets — is stuck in a standoff over how stablecoin rewards should be treated, with Coinbase and bank lobby groups pulling in opposite directions. The fight is narrow on its face but load-bearing: until the rewards question is resolved, the broader framework covering token classification, exchange registration, custody standards, and issuer disclosure is frozen.

Why it matters

CLARITY was drafted to settle the question of whether the SEC or the CFTC regulates which digital assets, replacing a patchwork of enforcement actions with a written rule book. Stablecoin rewards became the friction point because bank groups argue that yield paid to holders functionally turns a stablecoin into a deposit-like product, which would pull bank-style supervision into a corner of the crypto market that has historically operated outside it. Coinbase, whose revenue model leans heavily on stablecoin-linked rewards, is pushing the other way. Both sides have enough Senate votes to block a floor vote.

Market impact

The deadlock keeps the largest US crypto venues operating under the same regulatory ambiguity that has defined the post-2023 enforcement cycle. Spot trading, custody, and listing disclosures all remain tied to the bill's text. Until the rewards provision is resolved — either by amendment, by splitting it off, or by leadership-forced compromise — CLARITY cannot advance, and the rest of the market-structure clarity that crypto advocates have pitched for two years stays in limbo.

Related tokens
$USDC

Frequently asked questions

  1. What is the CLARITY Act?

    It is the Senate's long-awaited US market-structure bill for digital assets, designed to settle which regulator — SEC or CFTC — oversees which tokens and to write formal rules for exchanges, custody, and issuer disclosure.

  2. Why is the bill stuck?

    Coinbase and bank lobby groups are deadlocked over how stablecoin rewards should be treated. Both sides hold enough Senate votes to block a floor vote until the rewards question is resolved.

  3. Why do banks care about stablecoin rewards?

    Bank groups argue that yield paid to stablecoin holders functionally turns the asset into a deposit-like product, which they say should pull bank-style supervision into a slice of the crypto market that has historically operated outside it.

  4. What is Coinbase's position?

    Coinbase is pushing back on restrictions to stablecoin rewards, since the revenue model leans heavily on reward-linked products tied to USDC and similar assets.

  5. What happens if the deadlock continues?

    US crypto venues continue operating under the same regulatory ambiguity that has defined the post-2023 enforcement cycle, with spot trading, custody, and listing disclosures all tied to the bill's stalled text.

Source attribution
Aggregated from CryptoSlate · Verified · Last refreshed 45d ago
Open original →