Loading prices…
🩸BEARISH

Ledger Reseller Implant Drains $92.9M From 311 Wallets

The incident shows that self-custody cannot protect users from compromised hardware in the supply chain.

Ledger confirmed an unauthorized hardware implant in a wallet sold by its official reseller CryptoBilis. The supply-chain attack drained $92.9 million from 311 wallets, according to the report.

Why it matters

Self-custody puts control of funds in users’ hands, but it does not eliminate risks tied to how wallet hardware is sourced and sold. A compromised device can undermine security before a user even begins managing assets.

Market impact

CryptoBilis has stopped selling all hardware wallets, including products from Ledger, Trezor, Tangem and SafePal. The incident puts supply-chain integrity and reseller oversight in focus for hardware-wallet makers and users.

Frequently asked questions

  1. Where was the unauthorized hardware implant found?

    Ledger confirmed an unauthorized implant in a wallet sold through its official reseller CryptoBilis.

  2. How much was drained in the supply-chain attack?

    The attack drained $92.9 million from 311 wallets.

  3. What action did CryptoBilis take after the incident?

    CryptoBilis stopped selling all hardware wallets.

  4. Which other hardware-wallet brands were included in the sales halt?

    CryptoBilis halted sales of Trezor, Tangem and SafePal hardware wallets, along with Ledger products.

  5. Why does the incident matter for self-custody?

    Self-custody does not eliminate supply-chain risk. Compromised hardware can put wallet security at risk before users take control of their funds.

Source attribution
Aggregated from Crypto News · Verified · Last refreshed 1h ago
Open original →