Loading prices…
〽️NEUTRAL

Solana $18B Liquidation Claim Clashes With Public Records

The dispute puts liquidation estimates under scrutiny, while the FCA's 2027 deadline creates a separate authorisation choice for UK-facing crypto firms.

Public records contradict the $18B figure attached to Solana liquidation activity during the crypto crash, leaving a gap between the claim and verifiable market data.

Separately, the FCA has finalized UK crypto rules with a 2027 access deadline. Exchanges, custodians and stablecoin firms must decide whether UK access justifies a full FSMA authorisation process, even if they already hold AML registration.

Related tokens
$SOL

Frequently asked questions

  1. What does the disputed $18B figure relate to?

    It relates to Solana liquidation activity during the crypto crash.

  2. Why is the Solana liquidation estimate under scrutiny?

    Public records contradict the $18B figure, leaving a gap between the claim and verifiable market data.

  3. What deadline does the FCA's finalized regime set?

    It sets a 2027 access deadline for exchanges, custodians and stablecoin firms deciding whether UK access justifies full FSMA authorisation.

  4. Which firms face the FCA's UK access decision?

    Exchanges, custodians and stablecoin firms must decide whether UK access justifies a full FSMA authorisation process.

  5. Can AML registration substitute for FSMA authorisation?

    No. AML registration does not remove the decision over whether to pursue a full FSMA authorisation process.

Source attribution
Aggregated from CryptoSlate · Verified · Last refreshed 7h ago
Open original →