Griff Green, a member of the Arbitrum Security Council, accused Circle of refusing to freeze hacker-linked funds while Tether routinely does, saying Tether is staffed by "traditional crypto natives" who still value early-ecosystem principles. Green contrasted that with Circle, the Goldman Sachs-backed issuer of USDC, which he characterized as profit-driven and unwilling to act against threats to the broader crypto community.
Why it matters
The fight over which stablecoin issuer cooperates more actively with the security community is no longer abstract — it is now a competitive argument playing out on timelines. Tether's freeze tool has been a recurring feature of post-exploit coverage for years; Circle's $60B USDC, by contrast, has drawn quieter criticism for moving more slowly when law-enforcement-style requests land. Green's call for a community-led USDC sell-off is the sharpest public framing of that gap to date and lands as a named member of a major L2's security apparatus.
Market impact
A coordinated USDC exit driven by security-policy frustration would be the first retail- and DAO-level price action aimed at an issuer's behavior rather than its reserves. Even a small, vocal minority signaling willingness to de-peg USDC for political reasons tests Circle's liquidity backstops and reputation with institutional users — the exact constituency Goldman Sachs exposure is meant to court.
Frequently asked questions
-
Who is Griff Green and why does his criticism carry weight?
Griff Green is a publicly identified member of the Arbitrum Security Council, the multisig body that can take urgent on-chain action for the Arbitrum network. Criticism from a named L2 security steward is harder for issuers to dismiss than commentary from an anonymous account.
-
What is the core accusation against Circle?
Green argued that Circle does not actively freeze hacker-linked USDC the way Tether does, and that the company prioritizes profitability over cooperation with the security community because of its Goldman Sachs backing.
-
How does Tether's freeze record compare to Circle's?
Tether has a long public history of freezing addresses at the request of law enforcement and ecosystem partners after exploits, while Circle's freezes tend to be quieter and have drawn criticism for moving more slowly when similar requests land.
-
What would a community USDC sell-off actually achieve?
Green framed it as a reputational and liquidity lever: even a small, vocal coordinated exit over security policy would test Circle's redemption backstops and pressure its standing with the institutional users the issuer courts.
-
Is there precedent for a stablecoin losing peg over issuer behavior rather than reserves?
USDC briefly de-pegged in March 2023 when Silicon Valley Bank collapsed and Circle disclosed $3.3B in exposure, but that was a reserve-event depeg, not a security-policy-driven one. A coordinated sell-off aimed at issuer behavior would be a new category of stablecoin stress.
WatcherGuru
TheBlock
CoinDesk
Crypto Capital Venture
CryptoSlate
Lookonchain