WuBlockchain
Joseph Lubin said a security incident affected part of Consensys' infrastructure, prompting his team and partners to rotate validator keys as a precaution. Investigations so far show no indication that MetaMask wallets or customer funds were affected.
Why it matters
Users' recovery phrases and private keys were not involved, Lubin said. He also distinguished validator keys from withdrawal keys, which control transfers of staked ETH. His team does not hold clients' withdrawal keys.
Market impact
For ETH holders, the immediate concern is whether the infrastructure incident exposed funds. Lubin said the separation of keys prevented it from causing unauthorized transfers of staked ETH. The validator key rotation was a precaution while the investigation continues.
Frequently asked questions
-
What part of Consensys was affected?
Joseph Lubin said the security incident affected part of Consensys' infrastructure. His team and partners rotated validator keys as a precaution.
-
Did the incident involve MetaMask recovery phrases or private keys?
No. Lubin said users' recovery phrases and private keys were not involved.
-
Why were validator keys rotated?
Lubin said his team and partners rotated validator keys as a precaution after the infrastructure incident.
-
Could the incident cause unauthorized transfers of staked ETH?
Lubin said validator and withdrawal keys are separate and that his team does not hold clients' withdrawal keys, preventing unauthorized transfers of staked ETH from the incident.
-
What have investigators found about MetaMask wallets and customer funds?
Lubin said investigations so far show no indication that MetaMask wallets or customer funds were affected.
WatcherGuru
TheBlock
CoinTelegraph
CryptoSlate
CoinDesk
Lookonchain