Crypto News
Judge Analisa Torres, best known for ruling that XRP is not a security when traded on secondary markets, denied Kalshi's request for a preliminary injunction that sought to block New York from enforcing its gambling laws against the prediction market. The July 8 decision keeps New York's enforcement pathway open while Kalshi's broader challenge to the state's gambling statutes proceeds.
Why it matters
Torres sits at the intersection of two live regulatory fights. Her 2023 ruling on XRP became the anchor precedent that several altcoins cite when arguing secondary-market sales fall outside SEC securities jurisdiction. Now, presiding over Kalshi's fight against New York gaming regulators, she is drawing the boundary between federally overseen derivatives and state-regulated gambling. Prediction markets argue their event contracts are swaps under CFTC oversight; New York treats them as gambling products. The denial signals Torres is not yet willing to override state gambling law before the merits are heard.
Market impact
The ruling is procedural rather than merits-based, so the immediate market reaction in Kalshi-linked tokens or the broader prediction-market sector was muted. The read is that Kalshi and competitors now face a slower path to nationwide US rollout, with state-by-state negotiation likely until a final ruling or settlement clarifies the federal-versus-state split.
Frequently asked questions
-
What did Judge Torres decide in the Kalshi case?
She denied Kalshi's request for a preliminary injunction that sought to block New York from enforcing its gambling laws against the prediction market, leaving state enforcement open while the broader case proceeds.
-
How does this connect to the XRP ruling?
Torres is the same judge who ruled that XRP is not a security when traded on secondary markets. The Kalshi decision shows she is also willing to defer to state regulators where federal CFTC oversight does not clearly preempt them.
-
Why is Kalshi fighting New York's gambling laws?
Kalshi argues its event contracts are swaps under CFTC jurisdiction, not gambling products. New York treats them as gambling, which would require state gaming licenses and restrict access.
-
Is this a final ruling on Kalshi's status?
No. The denial is procedural and applies to the injunction request only. Kalshi's underlying challenge to New York's gambling statutes still has to be decided on the merits.
-
What does this mean for prediction markets in the US?
The read is a slower nationwide rollout. Prediction-market operators will likely need to negotiate state by state until a final ruling or settlement clarifies the boundary between federal derivatives oversight and state gambling law.
CryptoSlate
CoinTelegraph
CoinDesk
TheBlock
WuBlockchain
WatcherGuru