Loading prices…
🩸BEARISH

XRP holders revive Ripple CTO's 2017 thread amid $1.43 range

The argument over David Schwartz's eight-year-old liquidity math is small in itself — but it lands on an asset where 21 of 28 tracked indicators are already flashing bearish and price is compressed…

XRP holders revive Ripple CTO's 2017 thread amid $1.43 range
XRP holders revive Ripple CTO's 2017 thread amid $1.43 range
XRP holders revive Ripple CTO's 2017 thread amid $1.43 range

XRP holders resurfaced a 2017 X thread from Ripple CTO David Schwartz this week, accusing him of making a price promise when he argued the token could not stay "dirt cheap" if it ever handled large global transaction volumes. Schwartz pushed back, saying the post was a market-mechanics illustration — at $1 per XRP, moving $1 million requires one million tokens; at $1 million per XRP, a single token does the same work — not a price target, and that deleting the thread would only deepen the confusion.

The episode lands on a fragile tape. XRP is stuck in a tight range around $1.43 with 21 of 28 tracked indicators flashing bearish as of late April 2026, and the asset has so far failed to mount a sustained push above the $1.61 resistance that has capped every rally attempt this quarter. Support at $1.39 is the line holding the structure together; a clean break below it opens a thin downside pocket with little immediate bid.

Why it matters

For a community already sensitive to perceived promises from Ripple's leadership, the reappearance of an eight-year-old post is less a market event than a sentiment stress test. Schwartz's refusal to delete the thread — on the grounds that the original context matters more than the misreading — keeps the dispute alive rather than putting it to bed, which matters in a tape where positioning is already one-sided.

The underlying argument is the same one Schwartz made in 2017: a token used to move large value per transaction cannot trade at fractions of a cent. That thesis has not resolved in either direction — XRP's liquidity is real, but so is its multi-year range — and the current price action neither confirms nor refutes it.

Market impact

The technical picture dominates over the forum drama in the near term. Short-term momentum is still holding, which is why XRP has not broken down, but the longer-term indicators point lower and the range is compressing. A defended $1.43 base with volume could see a move toward $1.61; absent that, drift between $1.41 and $1.43 is the base case while traders wait for a catalyst.

Related tokens
$XRP

Frequently asked questions

  1. What did David Schwartz actually say about XRP in the 2017 post?

    He argued that if XRP handled large global transaction volumes, it could not stay "dirt cheap," using a liquidity example: at $1 per XRP, moving $1 million requires one million tokens, while at $1 million per token a single one does the job. Schwartz says this week that the post explained market mechanics, not a price…

  2. Why is the post resurfacing now?

    A vocal segment of the XRP community surfaced it on X this week, accusing Schwartz of having deliberately misled holders with a price promise. Schwartz responded that deleting the thread would strip useful context rather than resolve the confusion.

  3. What is XRP trading at and what are the key levels?

    XRP is stuck in a tight range around $1.43, with support at $1.39 and resistance at $1.61. A defended $1.43 base with volume could open a move toward $1.61; a break below $1.39 would expose a thin downside area with limited immediate support.

  4. Are the technical indicators bullish or bearish on XRP?

    Bearish-leaning. 21 of 28 tracked indicators were flashing bearish as of late April 2026. Short-term momentum is still holding, which is why price has not broken down, but longer-term indicators point lower and the range is compressing.

  5. Does the Schwartz controversy actually move XRP's price?

    Not directly. The dispute is a sentiment stress test rather than a market-moving event, but it lands on a tape where the catalyst calendar is thin and positioning is already one-sided, which can amplify any headline risk around Ripple leadership.

Source attribution
Aggregated from Crypto News · Verified · Last refreshed 75d ago
Open original →