Loading prices…
〽️NEUTRAL

SBF Asks Supreme Court to Overturn FTX Fraud Conviction

The petition hinges on whether defendants can introduce 'no-loss' evidence after Kousisis v. United States, and whether an $11B forfeiture order counts as an excessive fine under the 8th Amendment.

Sam Bankman-Fried has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn his November 2023 fraud conviction and the $11 billion forfeiture order attached to it. Bankman-Fried, the co-founder and former CEO of now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, is serving a 25-year prison sentence after a jury found him guilty on seven counts of fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering tied to the misappropriation of customer funds. The petition raises two distinct legal claims: that the trial court wrongly blocked him from presenting a "no-loss" defense, and that the $11 billion forfeiture order is constitutionally excessive.

Why it matters

The first question targets the fallout from the Supreme Court's 2025 decision in Kousisis v. United States, which held that an act can constitute wire fraud even without proof of net economic harm to victims. Bankman-Fried's lawyers argue that once prosecutors framed the case as "fraudulent inducement," they should not have been permitted to invite the jury to weigh customer losses the defense was then forbidden to rebut. The Second Circuit relied on Kousisis to affirm the conviction in June, rejecting Bankman-Fried's argument that FTX and Alameda "held sufficient assets to ultimately make investors and customers whole" and that customers were eventually repaid with interest.

The second claim raises an Eighth Amendment "excessive fines" challenge to the $11 billion forfeiture figure, an argument that has gained traction in white-collar sentencing disputes but has rarely succeeded against criminal forfeiture orders tied to fraud.

Market impact

For the broader crypto sector, the petition is less about a possible reversal and more about whether the courts will clarify the evidentiary rules around fraud prosecutions that cite customer losses as part of the narrative. A grant of certiorari would reopen a procedural debate every digital-asset fraud defendant is now watching, though the practical odds of Supreme Court review remain long, and the Court typically decides whether to take a case months after the petition lands.

Frequently asked questions

  1. What is Sam Bankman-Fried asking the Supreme Court to overturn?

    Bankman-Fried is asking the Court to overturn his November 2023 conviction on seven counts of fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering, and the $11 billion forfeiture order tied to it.

  2. What is the 'no-loss' argument in the petition?

    His lawyers argue the trial court should have let him show that FTX and Alameda held sufficient assets to make customers whole and that customers were eventually repaid with interest, undercutting the prosecution's loss narrative.

  3. What is Kousisis v. United States and how does it affect his case?

    Kousisis is a 2025 Supreme Court ruling that an act can constitute wire fraud without proof of net economic harm. The Second Circuit relied on it in June to affirm Bankman-Fried's conviction and reject his no-loss theory.

  4. What is the Eighth Amendment claim in the petition?

    Bankman-Fried argues that the $11 billion forfeiture order violates the Eighth Amendment's bar on excessive fines, a claim that courts have generally applied narrowly to criminal forfeiture tied to fraud.

  5. When will the Supreme Court decide whether to hear the case?

    According to CNN, the Court is expected to decide later this year whether to grant certiorari, though the practical odds of Supreme Court review at this stage remain long.

Source attribution
Aggregated from TheBlock · Verified · Last refreshed 1h ago
Open original →