CryptoSlate
A Solana frontend still carries a 60% quorum path, conflicting with the stated one-third rule. The issue comes as first governance proposals approach on the constitution, inflation schedule and fee structure. The discrepancy is confined to the display, with no identified failure in on-chain vote verification or the tally.
Proposals run from epoch 1021 to 1024. Pull request 170 would use the pre-vote snapshot total, move the marker to one-third and show participation as unavailable if matching data is missing. Snapshot totals for epoch 1020 were inconsistent, while the network router returned a 522 error.
Abstentions count toward one-third quorum, but the denominator for a separate two-thirds approval test remains unresolved. Solana Company plans to back the constitution and oppose the inflation and fee changes. The fix and reliable snapshot data must be ready before epoch 1021.
Frequently asked questions
-
Which issues will Solana’s first governance proposals decide?
They cover Solana’s constitution, inflation schedule and fee structure.
-
What quorum threshold does Solana’s governance rule set?
The stated rule uses one-third of network stake, and abstentions count toward that quorum.
-
How would Pull request 170 change the quorum display?
It would use the proposal’s pre-vote snapshot total, move the marker to one-third and show participation as unavailable when matching data is missing.
-
Why might Solana’s participation display be unavailable?
Snapshot totals for epoch 1020 were inconsistent, while the network router returned a 522 error.
-
What remains unresolved beyond the proposed frontend fix?
The denominator for the separate two-thirds approval test remains unresolved and is outside the proposed frontend fix.
Crypto News
CoinDesk
Lookonchain
TheBlock
WuBlockchain