The US government moved about $470 million in seized crypto to addresses Arkham Intelligence identified as likely Coinbase Prime wallets. The Oct. 7 transfers included Bitcoin, wrapped Bitcoin and USDT, with assets linked to seizures involving the 2016 Bitfinex hack and Alameda Research. The movement has revived questions about whether the government could sell any of the holdings, but a transfer alone does not establish that a sale is underway.
Why it matters
President Donald Trump’s March 2025 executive order created the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and said Bitcoin deposited into it “shall not be sold.” The order also allows digital assets to be disposed of when required by a court or law, including for victim restitution, law-enforcement purposes or other statutory forfeiture obligations. Seized Bitcoin therefore does not automatically have the same status as Bitcoin already placed in the reserve.
The Bitfinex-related assets carry competing forfeiture and restitution claims. The government seized about 95,000 BTC in 2022 from wallets controlled by Ilya Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan; authorities later seized roughly $475 million in assets tied to the theft. Separately, a judge in Sam Bankman-Fried’s case authorized recovered forfeiture funds to compensate FTX victims.
Market impact
The destination has drawn scrutiny because government crypto movements can prompt speculation about supply, but Arkham’s wallet attribution does not show whether the assets will be sold, held in custody or moved for another permitted purpose. The US Marshals Service previously denied selling Bitcoin tied to the Samourai Wallet case, saying liquidations of forfeited assets go through a multi-level approval process.
The market-relevant signal will be what happens next: whether the assets remain at Coinbase Prime, move to another custody arrangement or are converted to dollars. A confirmed sale of reserve Bitcoin outside the order’s exceptions would raise a different policy question from transfers made for custody or restitution.
Frequently asked questions
-
Does the $470 million transfer confirm the US government is selling Bitcoin?
No. Arkham identified the destination as likely Coinbase Prime addresses, but a wallet transfer alone does not establish that the assets were sold.
-
Which assets were included in the government transfers?
Arkham said the transfers included Bitcoin, wrapped Bitcoin and USDT.
-
Does the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve order ban every government crypto sale?
The order says Bitcoin deposited into the reserve shall not be sold, but permits some disposals when required by a court or law, including for victim restitution and law-enforcement purposes.
-
Why could the seized Bitcoin have a different status from reserve Bitcoin?
Assets connected to the Bitfinex theft and Alameda-related proceedings face forfeiture and restitution claims. Those obligations may affect their legal treatment.
-
What would clarify whether the transferred assets are being sold?
Whether the assets remain at Coinbase Prime, move to another custody arrangement or are converted to dollars would help clarify their treatment.
CryptoSlate