Loading prices…
🔥BULLISH

Wall Street execs warn legacy markets can't match 24/7 crypto

The bottleneck isn't throughput — Franklin Templeton, Apollo and Swift's ex-CIO all point to missing governance standards as the real reason 24/7 tokenized settlement hasn't shipped at institutional…

Wall Street and crypto executives warned at Consensus in Miami on Tuesday that financial markets are nearing a structural breaking point as 24/7, machine-driven trading collides with legacy systems designed for slower, human-paced processes. Franklin Templeton's Sandy Kaul framed the gap bluntly: "We're moving to a world where transactions happen at a speed no human can track," while almost every process in capital markets today "was built for humans, and none of them will stand up to what's coming."

Why it matters

The panel's core thesis is that blockchain infrastructure has already solved the transactional problem — tokenized stocks and money-market funds can move instantly, settle in seconds and operate continuously. Kaul described the shift as "unwinding a system that's been in place for 50 years and going back to settling one transaction at a time." The harder problem, panelists argued, is governance: ownership rules, compliance permissions and shared standards that institutions need before they can move meaningful balance sheets onchain. Tom Zschach, the former chief innovation officer at Swift, put it as: "We've solved the transaction problem. What's missing is a standard for governance." For large institutions, "certainty" beats speed — Zschach said any system that "might not work" is a non-starter.

Market impact

The practical payoff the panel kept returning to is the elimination of idle cash. Apollo's Christine Moy described a tokenized future where "every penny of my earnings is fully invested from the moment I earn it to the moment that I spend it" — a model that extends to corporate treasuries pooling funds into yield-generating assets until payments are due. The urgency is competitive: newer platforms offering always-on settlement are pulling clients from firms that still operate on batch-reconciled rails. The next phase of market structure will hinge less on latency and more on whether the industry can ship shared governance standards fast enough to let institutional capital move continuously without breaking the trust global finance depends on.

Frequently asked questions

  1. What did Wall Street executives actually warn about at Consensus Miami?

    They said financial markets are nearing a breaking point as 24/7, machine-driven trading collides with legacy systems designed for human-paced processes, with tokenization and real-time settlement exposing the gap.

  2. Is the bottleneck transaction speed or governance?

    Governance. Tom Zschach, former CIO at Swift, said the industry has solved the transaction problem but is missing a standard for governance — ownership, compliance and permissions — that institutions require before moving balance sheets onchain.

  3. How would tokenization change how cash sits in the financial system?

    Apollo's Christine Moy said investors and corporates could keep every penny fully invested from the moment it's earned until the moment it's spent, eliminating idle cash balances and letting treasuries pool funds into yield-generating assets until payments are due.

  4. What did Franklin Templeton's Sandy Kaul say about the shift?

    She said transactions are moving to a speed no human can track, while almost every process in capital markets today was built for humans and "none of them will stand up to what's coming" — framing the rebuild as a 50-year unwind of batch-based settlement.

  5. Why does certainty matter more than speed for institutions?

    Zschach said any system that "might not work" is a non-starter for large financial firms, where reliability outweighs throughput — competitive pressure from newer always-on platforms is forcing the rebuild, but trust is the constraint.

Source attribution
Aggregated from CoinDesk · Verified · Last refreshed 66d ago
Open original →