CryptoSlate
XRP traded near $1.29 on Oct. 29, roughly 24% to 25% below XRP Insights’ modeled acquisition cost for US-listed fund exposure, estimated at $1.71 to $1.712. Yet the tracker recorded a net reduction of about 2.96 million XRP from Oct. 26 to Oct. 28, equal to roughly 0.26% of the same measured fund cohort. The final session added about 174,140 XRP, partly reversing the earlier decline.
Why it matters
The tracker estimated about 1.17 billion XRP of exposure across six products on Oct. 28, rising to 1.19 billion when the XRP sleeve of the diversified Bitwise 10 Crypto Index Fund, or BITW, was included. Most of that measured exposure remained in place despite XRP trading well below the model’s estimated cost.
That cost estimate does not show whether ETF shareholders are collectively at a loss. The model tracks fund-level XRP holdings, not when investors bought fund shares or the prices they paid. It also excludes fees and any premiums or discounts to net asset value, and it is not a price floor or liquidation threshold.
Market impact
The decline was concentrated at Bitwise. Its fund’s holdings fell from about 416.61 million XRP on Oct. 23 to 413.82 million on Oct. 26, then stayed flat through Oct. 28. Franklin Templeton and 21Shares were flat over those three sessions. The flow calculation includes BITW but excludes Grayscale’s GXRP because of a historical data gap.
A clearer read on demand will require aligned holdings and share-count observations across issuers, alongside creation and redemption records. Sustained increases in both holdings and shares would indicate renewed net expansion; persistent reductions across several funds, with falling share counts, would point to a broader retreat. A decline in fund assets alone is not enough, since XRP’s price can change their dollar value without tokens leaving.
Frequently asked questions
-
How much did the measured XRP fund cohort reduce its holdings?
XRP Insights recorded a net reduction of about 2.96 million XRP from Oct. 26 to Oct. 28, roughly 0.26% of the same measured cohort. The final session added about 174,140 XRP.
-
Does the $1.71 modeled acquisition cost mean ETF shareholders are down 25%?
No. The estimate tracks fund-level XRP holdings, not when investors bought fund shares or the prices they paid. It also excludes fees and premiums or discounts to net asset value.
-
Which fund accounted for most of the reported XRP holdings decline?
The reduction was concentrated at Bitwise. Its holdings fell from about 416.61 million XRP on Oct. 23 to 413.82 million on Oct. 26, then stayed flat through Oct. 28.
-
What data would show whether XRP ETF demand is returning?
Aligned increases in XRP holdings and shares outstanding across several issuers would indicate renewed net expansion. Creation records can help clarify whether additions came from cash-funded acquisitions or in-kind transfers.
-
Why is a decline in XRP fund assets not proof that tokens were sold?
XRP’s price can change the dollar value of fund assets without any tokens leaving. Holdings and share-count data are needed to distinguish price effects from reductions in exposure.
Lookonchain
Glassnode
CoinDesk
WuBlockchain
TheBlock
CoinTelegraph