Clarity Act Stalls as Senate Democrats Block Advancement
The setback leaves digital-asset firms without the statutory rules lawmakers had negotiated, while Sen. Tim Scott is urging the SEC and CFTC to act in Congress's place.
Every Zipp story tagged #ClarityAct, newest first.
The setback leaves digital-asset firms without the statutory rules lawmakers had negotiated, while Sen. Tim Scott is urging the SEC and CFTC to act in Congress's place.
Bitcoin's response points to liquidity as the stronger near-term driver, but the Senate setback leaves regulatory uncertainty unresolved ahead of the midterms.
The next Congress could shape who writes the US framework, keeping policy uncertainty in focus as digital-asset adoption develops.
The setback leaves crypto market structure in regulatory limbo, with SEC and CFTC authority still blurred and a new Congress likely required to restart the process.
Garlinghouse framed the Clarity Act effort as an industry-wide push, not a campaign for Ripple alone.
Smith built the trade group in 2018 and now inherits it again with her Solana Policy Institute role intact.
The handoff lands as the Clarity Act stays stalled in the Senate, with a returning Kristin Smith now steering both the BA and the Solana Policy Institute at a critical policy moment.
The choice is not simply whether to own Bitcoin. Investors must also decide who handles keys, security, protocol events and the uncertainty left by the failed CLARITY Act vote.
The failed procedural vote leaves a bipartisan market-structure bill stalled, while partisan conflict threatens to delay clearer rules for the US crypto industry.
With the Senate blocking the bill and elections looming, officials say regulatory action will move ahead without waiting for a lame-duck deal.
The bill's path to 60 votes now depends on resolving stablecoin-yield demands from Republicans already inside its 49-vote coalition.
The vote exposes the gap between advocacy scale and Senate power: large membership and more than 1 million contacts did not produce the bipartisan coalition needed.
The spending marks Fairshake’s most aggressive midterm move yet and links a stalled federal framework to a direct test of crypto’s influence in Ohio.
The 49-50 cloture vote preserves agency-led rulemaking, protects banks from stablecoin yield competition and gives clearer jurisdictions a stronger pitch for crypto capital.
The vote creates a near-term policy catalyst, but Arthur Hayes argues Bitcoin's move began before Washington delivered regulatory clarity.
Traders braced for a wipeout from a double shock, but positioning told the story: few had bet on the bill's passage, so there was little to unwind, and attention now shifts to the SEC's…
The Senate draft set a $15,000 threshold for officials and spouses, but left a major gap as family fortunes remain tied to crypto businesses.
Agency rulemaking can move faster than Congress, but the resulting patchwork is easier to reverse and more exposed to legal challenges.
The market’s resilience stands out: a legislative setback has not translated into immediate weakness across crypto capitalization.
The argument puts US crypto regulation against a broader macro thesis: Bitcoin's next major move will be driven by debt and monetary policy, not a new market framework.