WuBlockchain
Bittensor founder @const_reborn acknowledged that the protocol is not yet fully decentralized, with core development still steered by a small leadership group. The reasoning, as he put it, is speed: a tighter inner circle can push AI-related upgrades faster than a dispersed governance process currently allows.
He drew a line between two layers. Ownership and the broader ecosystem are already distributed across subnet operators, validators, and token holders, with no single party controlling the network. What remains centralized is the protocol's core development and its mutability, the layer where governance and upgrade authority still concentrate.
Why it matters
Bittensor positions itself as decentralized AI infrastructure, a market where buyers, regulators, and partners increasingly treat decentralization as a feature, not a slogan. A leadership group that still controls core dev is a structural contradiction the project now has a public timeline to resolve.
Market impact
The 18-month target is the part investors and subnet operators will track. Hitting it cleanly would put the protocol's immutability claim on the same footing as its ownership model. Missing the window, or shipping it as a soft handoff rather than a genuine transfer of authority, would keep the centralization critique live in a space where the competing AI compute projects are getting louder.
Frequently asked questions
-
What did the Bittensor founder actually say about decentralization?
He said the protocol is not yet fully decentralized and that core development is still guided by a small leadership group, while ownership and the ecosystem are already distributed. Full decentralization and immutability are the stated goal, with a target of 18 months.
-
Why is core development still centralized on Bittensor?
According to the founder, the leadership group is kept tight to enable faster AI-related upgrades than a more dispersed governance process would allow. He framed centralization at the development layer as a deliberate speed choice, not a permanent design.
-
What parts of Bittensor are already decentralized?
Ownership of the network, the subnet ecosystem, and validator participation are already distributed across a wide set of operators and token holders, with no single party controlling the network at those layers.
-
What needs to happen for Bittensor to be considered fully decentralized?
Core development authority and protocol mutability need to move out of the small leadership group and into a more distributed governance process, with the protocol reaching an immutable state where no party can unilaterally change the rules.
-
What is the timeline Bittensor has set for full decentralization?
The founder targeted 18 months. Hitting that window with a genuine transfer of core authority is the benchmark subnet operators, TAO holders, and partners will measure the project against.
Crypto News
CoinDesk
Lookonchain
CryptoSlate
WatcherGuru
CoinTelegraph
Crypto Rank News