CryptoSlate
Strategy escalated its challenge to MSCI's proposed 'non-operating company' methodology on Aug. 31 by tying it to a defense MSCI made to the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2022. The Bitcoin treasury company argues the new screen forces MSCI to judge whether Bitcoin belongs inside an operating business, a classification decision MSCI previously told the SEC was outside the scope of index construction. MSCI's 2022 letter said index providers 'express no opinion or view as to whether any market, company, strategy or investment is good or bad,' a position Strategy says is harder to reconcile with a test that classifies corporate assets as operating or non-operating.
Why it matters
The concentration makes the dispute structural rather than procedural. According to MSCI figures cited by Strategy, six companies would initially face deletion or watchlisting under the proposed screen, with combined float-adjusted market capitalization of $27.55 billion. Strategy accounts for $23.93 billion of that, or roughly 86.9%, while the other five combined total about $3.62 billion. A methodology pitched as broad-based would, in its first iteration, fall overwhelmingly on the largest Bitcoin treasury company.
MSCI opened the consultation on Aug. 3 to expand existing exclusions for investment funds and business development companies. The proposal uses a core screen and five financial ratios to flag additional 'non-operating companies,' with four triggered flags rendering a stock ineligible for Global Investable Market Indexes. Strategy argues GAAP and IFRS provide no definitions for the operating and non-operating asset categories MSCI wants to introduce, meaning the index provider would be creating its own standard for whether Bitcoin activity counts as operating.
Market impact
Strategy's latest 10-Q strengthens the argument by reporting two operating segments, Software and Bitcoin, with Bitcoin covering treasury operations, acquisitions, capital markets, and capital management. MSCI could still classify the asset base behind that segment differently for index purposes, but doing so would force MSCI to impose its own definition of operating business on a company whose SEC filings already treat Bitcoin activity as operating.
Frequently asked questions
-
What is MSCI proposing that affects Strategy?
MSCI opened a consultation on Aug. 3 to add a 'non-operating company' screen using a core test and five financial ratios. Four triggered flags would render a stock ineligible for MSCI's Global Investable Market Indexes.
-
Why does Strategy account for 86.9% of the affected value?
According to MSCI figures cited by Strategy, six companies would initially face deletion or watchlisting, with combined float-adjusted market cap of $27.55 billion. Strategy alone holds $23.93 billion, or roughly 86.9%.
-
How is Strategy using MSCI's 2022 SEC letter?
In its 2022 comment letter, MSCI said index providers 'express no opinion or view as to whether any market, company, strategy or investment is good or bad.' Strategy argues the proposed screen forces exactly that kind of judgment about Bitcoin.
-
When does MSCI plan to decide on the proposal?
MSCI is accepting feedback through Sept. 30 and expects to announce its decision on or before Oct. 16. Implementation is proposed for the November 2026 Index Review.
-
What regulatory risk does the dispute reopen?
Strategy is connecting the methodology to the SEC's 2022 inquiry into whether index providers fall within the Investment Advisers Act, and pointing to MSCI's own disclosure that adviser-style obligations could raise costs and complexity.
CoinDesk
TheBlock
Crypto News
WatcherGuru