Loading prices…
Technology

Upgrades

Hard forks, soft forks, scheduled mainnet upgrades, and network split events.

Protocol upgrades change the rules that blockchains use to validate transactions, produce blocks and coordinate network participants. This beat covers hard forks, soft forks, scheduled mainnet releases and unplanned chain splits, from major redesigns of Ethereum to Cardano deployments such as Leios and Van Rossem. It also follows upgrades that affect execution, consensus, governance and security, including Solana’s stake-weighted voting and work around Firedancer and Alpenglow, Starknet’s post-quantum roadmap, and releases such as Base’s Beryl upgrade. These changes matter because even a technical update can alter fees, throughput, validator requirements, smart-contract behavior or the assumptions on which wallets, bridges and exchanges rely.

Zipp tracks each upgrade from proposal and testnet work through client releases, activation and post-launch monitoring. Our coverage distinguishes a long-term roadmap from approved code, and a scheduled activation from a completed deployment. We examine whether node operators must update software, how consensus thresholds are measured, which features are included or deferred, and whether validators or users face compatibility risks. When a fork could create competing histories, we follow chain support, replay protection, asset treatment and infrastructure readiness rather than treating every software release as a new token event. For networks associated with ETH, ADA, SOL, BTC, XRP and UNI, the focus remains on what changed at protocol level, who must act, and what evidence shows that the upgraded network is operating as intended.

Related tokens

Frequently asked questions

  1. What is the difference between a hard fork and a soft fork?

    A hard fork introduces rules that older node software may reject, so participants generally need to upgrade to remain on the same chain. A soft fork tightens existing rules in a way that can remain compatible with non-upgraded nodes, although miners or validators may still need to adopt it for activation.

  2. Does every hard fork create a new cryptocurrency?

    No. Most hard forks are coordinated upgrades in which users, validators and infrastructure providers continue following one canonical chain. A separate asset emerges only if competing rule sets retain meaningful support and produce persistent, independent chains.

  3. How can I tell whether a mainnet upgrade is actually live?

    Check the announced activation condition, compatible client versions and block or epoch data from independent explorers. A completed activation should also be supported by stable block production, validator participation and status reports from core infrastructure providers.

  4. Why do crypto exchanges pause deposits and withdrawals during network upgrades?

    Exchanges may pause transfers to update node software and avoid processing transactions while finality or chain stability is uncertain. Trading can continue internally even when onchain deposits and withdrawals are temporarily unavailable.