CryptoSlate
Banks in the US, UK, and Europe now have a legal path to issue stablecoins, custody Bitcoin, and settle tokenized funds, yet the Basel Committee's cryptoasset standard, live in member jurisdictions since January 1, 2026, prices an unbacked Bitcoin position as if it were close to a guaranteed loss. The standard puts Group 2b crypto in the most punitive bucket in the framework with a 1,250% risk weight, which against Basel's 8% minimum capital ratio forces a bank to hold roughly a dollar of equity for every dollar of Bitcoin on its books.
That gap between permission and capital cost is the part of crypto regulation almost nobody is paying attention to, even though it decides how much digital-asset activity ends up inside regulated banks rather than nonbank issuers and crypto-native firms.
Why it matters
The Basel standard was built in a different era, when supervisors were mostly trying to keep crypto out of the banking system, and it absorbed the scars of stablecoin opacity, exchange collapses, and the contagion that ran through FTX and Celsius. The phase banks are walking into now looks very different, with tokenized deposits, stablecoin reserve management, custody, and on-chain settlement already showing up on regulated balance sheets at JPMorgan (JPMD), Citi (Token Services), and HSBC.
The Committee itself can see the fit has loosened, which is why it opened an expedited review of targeted parts of SCO60 in November 2025, recorded progress through February and May of 2026, and has promised an update later this year. The Trump administration went the other direction, with Executive Order 14178 and the July 2025 digital-asset report calling the fixed 1,250% weight anti-innovation and pointing US regulators toward a risk-based approach. Europe is holding the cautious line and folding the Basel treatment into its CRR3 capital rules. The result is that a global bank can face a heavier capital charge on the same tokenized asset in Frankfurt than in New York, and has to build separate digital-asset products for separate jurisdictions just to deal with it.
Market impact
The math is the story. On a $100 million Bitcoin position, the 1,250% risk weight plus 8% capital eats roughly $100 million of equity, and the bill climbs further once buffers and supervisory add-ons are stacked on top because long and short exposures do not net.
Frequently asked questions
-
What is the Basel cryptoasset standard and when did it go live?
Basel's cryptoasset standard, known as SCO60, sets how banks in member jurisdictions must treat digital-asset exposures under the capital rulebook. It has been live in member jurisdictions since January 1, 2026, and sorts everything a bank might touch into Group 1a, Group 1b, Group 2a, and Group 2b, each with its own…
-
Why does a 1,250% risk weight make Bitcoin uneconomic for banks?
A 1,250% risk weight on Group 2b crypto, applied against Basel's 8% minimum capital ratio, forces a bank to hold roughly a dollar of equity for every dollar of unbacked Bitcoin on its books. Long and short exposures do not net, buffers and supervisory add-ons stack on top, and a 2% of Tier 1 trigger drags every Group…
-
How are the US, UK, and EU treating Basel crypto rules differently?
The Trump administration rejected the fixed 1,250% weight under Executive Order 14178 and the July 2025 digital-asset report, pointing US regulators toward a risk-based approach tied to how crypto markets actually behave. Europe is holding the cautious line and folding the Basel treatment into its CRR3 capital rules…
-
Why do stablecoins matter so much in the Basel capital debate?
The stablecoin market is now near $320 billion and almost entirely dollar-denominated, and a fully reserved payment stablecoin, a bank's own tokenized deposit, and a tokenized money-market fund each carry different legal claims. The capital treatment that wins will decide how much of the settlement layer banks hold…
-
What changes if the Basel Committee recalibrates SCO60 this year?
If SCO60 stays punitive, regulated issuers lean harder on nonbank infrastructure, tokenized markets keep scaling outside the bank perimeter, and crypto-native firms hold a larger share of settlement. If the treatment turns more risk-sensitive, tokenized deposits become a credible rival to payment stablecoins,…
Altcoin Daily
WuBlockchain
CoinDesk
CoinTelegraph
TheBlock
Crypto News
Crypto Capital Venture