Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Friday reaffirmed the administration's opposition to a US central bank digital currency, warning that issuing one would mark "the first step toward tracking." The statement removes any near-term path to a retail Federal Reserve settlement layer and ratifies the position the White House has signaled since the start of the year.
Why it matters
Bessent's language is more than policy preference — it sets a hard ceiling on what US banks, custodians, and stablecoin issuers can expect from the federal balance sheet. A retail CBDC would have placed the Treasury / Fed in direct competition with commercial-bank deposit franchises and Tether- and Circle-issued stablecoins; ruling it out clarifies the regulatory perimeter for the entire dollar-denominated digital asset stack. It also sharpens the contrast with the eurozone and China, both of which continue to advance wholesale and retail CBDC pilots.
Market impact
For stablecoin issuers and tokenized-dollar projects, the reaffirmation is structurally bullish: the policy vacuum a CBDC would have filled stays open, leaving USDT and USDC as the dominant dollar settlement rails in crypto markets. The near-term price reaction is muted — this is a policy stance, not a flow event — but the second-order read matters: any bank or asset manager building a digital-dollar product now knows the public-sector alternative is off the table through at least the current administration.
Frequently asked questions
-
What did Scott Bessent say about a US CBDC?
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Friday reaffirmed the administration's opposition to a US central bank digital currency, warning that issuing one would mark "the first step toward tracking" and that there will be no CBDC under the current administration.
-
Does the US have a CBDC now?
No. The US has not issued a central bank digital currency, and Bessent's statement confirms the administration's position that no retail Federal Reserve settlement layer will be built under this White House.
-
How does the US stance on CBDCs compare to other regions?
The eurozone and China continue to advance both wholesale and retail CBDC pilots, putting the US at the opposite end of the policy spectrum from the two largest alternative currency blocs.
-
What does the no-CBDC stance mean for stablecoins?
It leaves the dollar-denominated digital asset stack to private issuers like Tether and Circle, with no public-sector settlement layer competing for the same use case — structurally favorable for USDT and USDC market share.
-
Could a future administration reverse the US no-CBDC policy?
A future administration could revisit the question, but Bessent's statement sets the policy ceiling through at least the current term. Banks and asset managers building digital-dollar products can now plan around the assumption that no public-sector alternative will appear in the near term.
CoinDesk
TheBlock
WatcherGuru
WuBlockchain
Altcoin Daily
Crypto News