Loading prices…
🩸BEARISH

Citi: missing new BTC buyers matter more than Strategy's…

Citi analyst Alex Saunders is pointing investors past the Strategy (MSTR) bitcoin sale headlines toward a more…

Citi: missing new BTC buyers matter more than Strategy's…
Citi: missing new BTC buyers matter more than Strategy's…
Citi: missing new BTC buyers matter more than Strategy's…
Citi: missing new BTC buyers matter more than Strategy's…

Citi analyst Alex Saunders is pointing investors past the Strategy (MSTR) bitcoin sale headlines toward a more structural concern: the absence of fresh demand. While markets were rattled by Strategy's rare disposal of a small portion of its BTC holdings — the first sale in years from one of bitcoin's most influential corporate backers — Citi said the transaction was a pre-disclosed tax-optimization move that doesn't alter the firm's long-term accumulation thesis.

Why it matters

The real signal, Saunders argues, is in ETF flows. Citi estimates spot bitcoin ETF inflows explain roughly 45% of weekly BTC price variation, making them the single best high-frequency gauge of investor adoption. Those flows have now turned negative. Compounding the demand picture, Saunders flagged that the odds of a U.S. crypto market structure bill passing this year are declining — removing what the bank viewed as a potential catalyst for a new wave of retail and institutional inflows. Without legislative progress or renewed fiscal-sustainability concerns pushing safe-haven bids, Citi expects sentiment to stay muted.

Market impact

BTC was trading around $67,200 at the time of the report, underperforming equities on a relative basis. The combination of negative ETF flows, a fading regulatory catalyst, and lingering anxiety over whether other digital asset treasury firms might follow Strategy's lead creates a low-conviction environment for bulls. Citi's framing suggests the path back to positive momentum runs through ETF flow reversal and regulatory clarity — neither of which appears imminent.

Related tokens
$BTC
Source attribution
Aggregated from CoinDesk · Verified · Last refreshed 44m ago
Open original →