Loading prices…
〽️NEUTRAL

GENIUS Act Leaves DeFi Lending Risks Unchecked

Ajna's co-founders argue that stablecoin reserve protections do not shield lenders from governance changes or faulty price feeds.

GENIUS Act Leaves DeFi Lending Risks Unchecked
GENIUS Act Leaves DeFi Lending Risks Unchecked
GENIUS Act Leaves DeFi Lending Risks Unchecked
GENIUS Act Leaves DeFi Lending Risks Unchecked

Stablecoin issuer safeguards under the GENIUS Act do not protect DeFi lenders from changes to loan terms or faulty price feeds, Ajna co-founders Mike Hathaway and Joseph Quintilian argue. Federal Reserve proposals include reserve, capital and risk-management requirements for issuers, as well as redemption within two business days.

The authors point to a Moonwell governance vote that set up a feed valuing Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH (cbETH) at about $1.12 instead of roughly $2,200, leaving about $1.78 million in bad debt. They also cite an Aave risk-tool setting that undervalued Lido's wrapped staked ether (wstETH) by about 2.85%, triggering roughly $27 million in liquidations.

Ajna uses no oracle and says its pool rules cannot be changed once live. The trade-off, the authors acknowledge, is that a flaw cannot be patched in place; users must choose to move to a new version.

Related tokens
$CBETH

Frequently asked questions

  1. Which stablecoin issuer safeguards are included in the Federal Reserve proposals?

    The proposals include reserve, capital and risk-management requirements, as well as redemption within two business days.

  2. How can governance affect a DeFi loan after funds are deposited?

    Governance can change lending-market terms, including collateral rules, liquidation thresholds or interest rates, depending on the market.

  3. What happened when Moonwell's cbETH price feed malfunctioned?

    The feed valued cbETH at about $1.12 instead of roughly $2,200, leaving about $1.78 million in bad debt.

  4. How did an Aave risk-tool setting affect wstETH liquidations?

    The setting undervalued wstETH by about 2.85%, triggering roughly $27 million in liquidations.

  5. What is the trade-off of Ajna's unchangeable pool rules?

    Ajna says live pool rules cannot be changed, but a flaw cannot be patched in place. Users must choose whether to move to a new version.

Source attribution
Aggregated from CoinDesk · Verified · Last refreshed 17m ago
Open original →