CoinDesk
JPMorgan told clients on Monday that institutional demand for perpetual futures remains limited, with the products still functioning more as speculative trading instruments than as institutional hedging tools. The bank pointed to client conversations showing muted interest from producers, consumers, and asset managers, and argued that perpetuals offer few incremental advantages over legacy derivatives for institutions that need cleared, term-structured, physically delivered contracts.
The report lands at a moment when perps dominate crypto derivatives activity, accounting for roughly 90% of crypto derivatives trading and frequently printing more volume than spot markets on the underlying tokens. JPMorgan's read is that the product's design works against institutional adoption rather than for it: unbounded basis risk, the absence of a forward term structure, and the lack of physical delivery all make perpetuals a poor fit for commercial hedgers and benchmarked asset managers. On-chain perpetuals are unlikely to draw U.S. institutions because they lack traditional clearing protections, while off-chain variants reduce roll risk but keep the rest of the structural drag.
Why it matters
The framing matters because JPMorgan is the dealer many of those institutions call first. A read from the bank's research desk that perps are not an institutional primitive carries weight with the chief investment officers, treasurers, and risk teams who would otherwise be the natural onboarding cohort. If the largest U.S. bank is telling clients perpetuals are speculative rather than hedging-grade, the regulatory and prime-brokerage path for broader institutional perps access gets measurably harder. It also reframes the dominant crypto derivatives product as a retail and momentum venue at exactly the time the industry has been pitching it as a maturing market structure.
Market impact
The report also flagged concentration risk in offshore perps markets.
Frequently asked questions
-
What did JPMorgan say about institutional demand for perpetual futures?
The bank said client checks show limited institutional demand, with perpetuals used mostly for speculative leveraged trading rather than hedging by producers, consumers, or benchmarked asset managers.
-
Why are perpetual futures hard for institutions to adopt?
JPMorgan cited unbounded basis risk, the absence of a forward term structure, lack of physical delivery, and clearing concerns on on-chain perpetuals as the key barriers.
-
How concentrated is offshore perpetual futures trading?
Citing public Hyperliquid data, JPMorgan said roughly half of perpetuals volume on that venue is funded by just 12 wallets, raising questions about market depth.
-
How big is the perpetual futures market in crypto?
Perpetuals account for roughly 90% of crypto derivatives trading and often generate more volume than the underlying spot markets.
-
Does JPMorgan think perpetuals have any future role for institutions?
The bank acknowledged advantages like 24/7 trading and no roll costs, but said those benefits fit retail and momentum traders rather than institutional hedging use cases.
TheBlock
Crypto Capital Venture
WatcherGuru
Whale Alert
WuBlockchain