WuBlockchain
A Swiss campaign to force the Swiss National Bank to hold Bitcoin in its reserves will lapse after supporters collected only about half the 100,000 signatures required to trigger a national referendum, Reuters reported. Switzerland's three-year signature window for citizen-initiated votes has closed without the threshold being met, ending the push before it ever reached the ballot stage.
The Swiss National Bank had already publicly rejected the proposal, arguing that cryptocurrencies are too volatile and insufficiently liquid to meet its reserve requirements. That stance framed the campaign uphill from the start, even before signature-gathering shortfalls became clear.
Why it matters
The episode is the highest-profile European attempt to date to embed Bitcoin directly onto a G10 central bank's balance sheet. Switzerland, home to a deep crypto-banking corridor and the Crypto Valley ecosystem around Zug, was considered one of the more plausible jurisdictions for such a push. Its failure narrows the field of realistic sovereign-Bitcoin-adoption candidates and gives ammunition to central banks weighing the volatility argument against similar proposals.
Market impact
Bitcoin's price reaction was muted — the story was widely anticipated after months of slow signature accumulation, and Switzerland was never likely to move global flows on its own. The cleaner read is on the policy side: every G10 central bank now has another recent data point showing that direct sovereign BTC reserve adoption faces not just regulatory but popular-legitimacy headwinds, even in crypto-friendly jurisdictions.
The lapse does not foreclose a future attempt, but any new Swiss push would need to restart the signature clock from zero and contend with the SNB's stated objections head-on.
Frequently asked questions
-
What was the Swiss Bitcoin reserve campaign?
A citizen initiative that aimed to force the Swiss National Bank to hold Bitcoin as part of its reserves. Under Switzerland's direct democracy rules, it needed 100,000 valid signatures within three years to trigger a binding national referendum.
-
Why did the campaign fail?
Supporters collected only about half of the 100,000 signatures required, well short of the threshold before the three-year window closed. The SNB had also publicly rejected the idea, citing volatility and liquidity concerns.
-
What was the Swiss National Bank's position on Bitcoin?
The SNB publicly rejected the proposal, arguing that cryptocurrencies are too volatile and insufficiently liquid to meet its reserve requirements. That stance was in place long before signature-gathering fell short.
-
Would this have changed Bitcoin's price if it passed?
On its own, unlikely. Switzerland's central bank balance sheet is small relative to global Bitcoin liquidity. The real significance was symbolic: it would have been the first G10 central bank to formally hold BTC.
-
Could a new Swiss Bitcoin reserve campaign be launched?
Yes. Any new effort would need to restart the three-year signature clock from zero and would face the SNB's stated objections from the outset, but the legal pathway remains open under Swiss direct-democracy rules.
CryptoSlate
WatcherGuru
TheBlock
Crypto News
CoinTelegraph