Binance and BNB Chain Offer Support to Bitget
The message signals a show of solidarity from Binance, the BNB Chain ecosystem and the wider crypto community, without specifying the form of assistance.
The message signals a show of solidarity from Binance, the BNB Chain ecosystem and the wider crypto community, without specifying the form of assistance.
The freeze reaches only a small share of the $351.6M haul: more than 63,000 ETH remains in exploiter addresses beyond stablecoin issuers’ control.
The weekly roundup pairs a major exchange security incident with growing institutional and retail access to blockchain-based financial services.
ETF inflows have exceeded realized profits, while exchange outflows and continued Ether ETF demand add to the constructive market picture.
A broad risk-on rotation is lifting speculative tokens even as traders absorb a $351.6M exchange hack and derivatives activity cools.
The reassurance comes as withdrawals resume could test whether customers trust the exchange's ability to withstand losses and a potential run.
The $351.6M breach remains under investigation, and frozen or recovered assets could reduce the eventual loss. Withdrawals stay suspended until security checks are complete.
The dispute puts bridge security design and LayerZero’s alleged assurances under scrutiny, as KelpDAO says users have withdrawn more than $650M since the attack.
The April 22 attack drained 116,500 rsETH and helped trigger a $20B DeFi deposit exodus, putting bridge security and accountability under scrutiny.
Bitget says its $464M User Protection Fund covers the reported loss, but withdrawals remain frozen as investigators examine the attack and an unconfirmed North Korea link.
The lawsuit puts bridge security and responsibility for the exploit at the center of a dispute involving LayerZero and its co-founder.
Bitget says its $464M-plus protection fund covers the loss, but withdrawals remain paused while the exchange reviews security and works to confirm a restart timeline.
The attribution, if confirmed, would put a major exchange breach in the spotlight of state-linked cybercrime and raise fresh questions about stolen-fund recovery.
Bitget says its user protection fund exceeds $464 million, a reserve it says is sufficient to cover the loss after the hot-wallet transfers.
The attribution remains unconfirmed, but the alleged DPRK connection raises the stakes for exchange security and scrutiny around the $352M loss.
The breach has already moved most stolen EVM-chain funds into ETH, concentrating $183M in a single recovery and liquidation challenge.
The reported loss puts exchange custody controls and market confidence back in focus.
Bitget says cold wallets and user funds remain secure, with its $464M protection fund covering the loss as withdrawals stay paused.
Withdrawals remain paused while Bitget investigates, but the exchange says its $464M-plus protection fund covers the loss and customer balances remain accurate.
Bitget says cold wallets and user funds remain secure, but withdrawals are paused while the exchange reviews unauthorized hot- and warm-wallet transfers.