Loading prices…
🔥BULLISH

Bernstein rates Figure Outperform, sees 72% upside on tokenization

Q1 loan volumes doubled to $2.9B with a 6% revenue beat — but the real call is that the market is pricing FIGR like a fintech, not the pure-play tokenization platform Bernstein thinks it is.

Bernstein reiterated its Outperform rating and $67 price target on Figure Technology Solutions after Q1 2026 loan volumes hit $2.9 billion, up 113% year-over-year. Adjusted net revenue of $167 million beat consensus by 6%, and the firm argues the 72% gap between its target and FIGR's current $38.97 print reflects a mispricing — investors are still valuing the company like a fintech, not a pure-play tokenization platform.

Why it matters

The tokenization call is the load-bearing piece of the thesis. Figure's HELOC-native blockchain rails let originators move whole loans on-chain, fractionalize them, and settle in near-real-time — a structural cost advantage that a traditional lending balance sheet can't replicate. If that stack holds at scale, the multiples of legacy mortgage-tech peers are the wrong comp set.

Market impact

A doubled loan-origination quarter with a clean revenue beat makes the bear case harder to argue on fundamentals alone. The debate now shifts to whether the tokenization premium earns itself: comparable on-chain private credit protocols have shown what credible collateral backing can do to financing spreads, and Bernstein is betting FIGR captures a similar dynamic inside a regulated, consumer-loan wrapper.

Frequently asked questions

  1. What is Figure Technology Solutions' current price target from Bernstein?

    Bernstein reiterated its Outperform rating and $67 price target on Figure Technology Solutions after Q1 2026 results, implying roughly 72% upside from the $38.97 share price at the time of the note.

  2. How much did Figure's loan originations grow in Q1 2026?

    Loan volumes hit $2.9 billion in Q1 2026, up 113% year-over-year, with adjusted net revenue of $167 million beating consensus by 6%.

  3. Why does Bernstein see Figure as a tokenization play rather than a fintech?

    Bernstein argues Figure's HELOC-native blockchain rails let originators move whole loans on-chain, fractionalize them, and settle near-real-time — a structural cost advantage legacy mortgage-tech balance sheets cannot replicate.

  4. What does the tokenization thesis mean for Figure's valuation multiple?

    Bernstein contends investors are applying fintech multiples to FIGR when the appropriate comp set is on-chain private credit and tokenization platforms, which have historically commanded higher multiples when collateral backing is credible.

  5. What would invalidate Bernstein's Figure price target?

    A breakdown in the tokenization premium — either regulatory pushback on on-chain loan settlement or a deceleration in origination growth — would force a re-rating back toward traditional fintech multiples and shrink the upside to Bernstein's $67 target.

Source attribution
Aggregated from TheBlock · Verified · Last refreshed 45d ago
Open original →