Loading prices…
🩸BEARISH

BTC Long-Term Holders Still in Profit as LTH Loss Metric Holds at 14%

The 30-day SMA of relative LTH unrealized loss is far from the ~70% threshold past cycles have resolved at — historically, that gap has closed only after deeper drawdowns.

Long-Term Holder relative unrealized loss — the total paper loss held by the most convicted cohort, normalized by market cap — is sitting at 14% on its 30-day simple moving average. By that measure, the current cycle is nowhere near the pain threshold past bear markets have resolved at, which historically lands around 70% of market cap.

Why it matters

Prior cycle bottoms in Bitcoin have consistently required LTHs to absorb the bulk of the loss-bearing supply. The 30D-SMA at 14% implies that the cohort that bought early and held through volatility is still largely in profit on a mark-to-market basis. Past resets only completed once long-term holders capitulated into the same loss zone retail did — a transfer of underwater supply that historically marked durable lows.

Market impact

Until that 70% threshold comes into view, the historical pattern argues against calling a structural bottom. The gap between current pain and prior-cycle pain can close two ways: a further drawdown that pushes underwater LTH supply higher, or a long sideways grind that slowly burns the unrealized profit down. Neither path is fast, and the data argues against the latter having done the work yet.

Related tokens
$BTC

Frequently asked questions

  1. What is LTH Relative Unrealized Loss?

    It is the total unrealized loss held by long-term holders, normalized by market cap. The metric measures how deep underwater the most convicted cohort is on a mark-to-market basis.

  2. What is the current LTH unrealized loss reading?

    The 30-day simple moving average sits at 14% of market cap, according to the seed data.

  3. What level has historically marked prior bear-market bottoms?

    Past cycle lows have resolved at roughly 70% of market cap for LTH relative unrealized loss — substantially above the current 14% reading.

  4. Why does the gap between 14% and 70% matter?

    Prior cycle resets only completed once long-term holders capitulated into the same loss zone retail had already reached. The current reading implies that transfer of underwater supply has not yet happened.

  5. How could the gap to 70% close?

    Historically the gap closes via a deeper drawdown that pushes underwater LTH supply higher, or a long sideways grind that slowly bleeds unrealized profit. The data argues the slow-grind path has not yet done the work.

Source attribution
Aggregated from Glassnode · Verified · Last refreshed 50d ago
Open original →
Original content