Loading prices…
🔥BULLISH

Crypto CLARITY Act advances as Trump signs off on ethics language

The president agreed to what Sen. Moreno called the most aggressive ethics language in US history, but Trump family crypto income above $1.4B is exactly why Democratic votes are still not in the bag.

President Donald Trump has approved proposed ethics restrictions tied to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, removing one of the central obstacles in months of negotiations and shifting the next decision to Senate Democrats who have demanded limits on how public officials profit from digital assets. The agreement followed a July 16 White House meeting between Trump, Republican Sens. Bernie Moreno of Ohio and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, and White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt; no deal emerged that day, but Trump signed off on the language Monday. Moreno told CNBC that Trump accepted what he called the most aggressive ethics language in US history. Democrats had not yet reviewed the newly approved text when Trump's position was reported.

Why it matters

The stakes are unusually personal. Trump's 2025 financial disclosure showed more than $1.4 billion in income tied to family crypto ventures, including World Liberty Financial, which alone delivered close to $800 million in proceeds to entities linked to the president. That is why Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats have argued market-structure legislation without strong ethics provisions effectively lets Trump continue profiting from an industry his administration regulates. Sen. Angela Alsobrooks said any ethics deal still has to cover the president, vice president and members of Congress, and called financial-crime provisions unfinished business. Republicans would need 60 votes to overcome a filibuster, and the committee bill drew only two Democratic yeses.

Market impact

Prediction markets moved on the news: a Polymarket contract on CLARITY becoming law in 2026 jumped from roughly 32% to about 42% on more than $2 million in volume, a real but partial repricing that leaves the bill below even odds. The Senate Banking Committee advanced the package 15-9 on May 14, with Democratic Sens. Ruben Gallego and Alsobrooks joining Republicans, but both made clear their committee votes did not commit them on the floor. Supporters now have until the August state work period begins Aug. 10 to lock in votes, reconcile the Senate version with the House-passed H.R. 3633, and resolve remaining disputes over DeFi and illicit-finance provisions before the midterm calendar narrows the path further.

Related tokens
$BTC $ETH $SOL

Frequently asked questions

  1. What did Trump actually agree to on the CLARITY Act?

    Trump approved proposed ethics restrictions tied to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act after a July 16 White House meeting with Republican Sens. Bernie Moreno and Cynthia Lummis. Sen. Moreno told CNBC Trump accepted what he called the most aggressive ethics language in US history.

  2. Why is the ethics fight personal to Trump?

    Trump's 2025 financial disclosure showed more than $1.4 billion in income tied to family crypto ventures, including World Liberty Financial, which alone delivered close to $800 million in proceeds to entities linked to the president.

  3. How many Democratic votes does CLARITY still need?

    Republicans need 60 votes to overcome a Senate filibuster, and the Banking Committee bill drew only two Democratic yeses on its May 14 markup. Democrats Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks joined Republicans then but said their votes did not commit them on the floor.

  4. How did prediction markets react to the news?

    A Polymarket contract on CLARITY becoming law in 2026 jumped from roughly 32% to about 42% on more than $2 million in trading volume after reports of Trump's concession, though pricing remains below even odds.

  5. What is the Senate timeline for CLARITY?

    Supporters have until the Senate's August state work period begins Aug. 10 to lock in votes, reconcile the Senate version with the House-passed H.R. 3633, and resolve remaining disputes over DeFi and illicit-finance provisions before midterm-year politics narrow the path further.

Source attribution
Aggregated from CryptoSlate · Verified · Last refreshed 2h ago
Open original →