CoinTelegraph
Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh is considering reducing the frequency of Federal Reserve policy meetings, according to the New York Times. The current schedule sets eight FOMC rate decisions per year, a cadence that has anchored market positioning, derivatives hedging, and the macro news cycle for decades.
Why it matters
Cutting the number of scheduled meetings would slow the rhythm of forward guidance markets have built entire trading calendars around. Every skipped decision is one fewer data point for the dot plot, one fewer press conference for the Chair to set expectations, and one fewer opportunity for the Committee to recalibrate. Even a modest reduction, from eight to six meetings annually, would reshape how rates desks, futures positioning, and the bond market parse Fed communication between events.
Market impact
Any change to the meeting cadence would require broad FOMC buy-in rather than a unilateral Chair decision, meaning the proposal is more a signal of Warsh's preferences than an imminent policy shift. The dollar and front-endTreasury yields tend to price uncertainty around Fed-process changes more than the underlying rate path, so the headline itself can move FX and rate futures even before any formal vote. Watch for follow-up coverage on whether other FOMC members publicly endorse or push back on the idea.
Frequently asked questions
-
Is the Fed actually cutting the number of FOMC meetings?
No decision has been made. The New York Times reports that Chair Warsh is considering the change, and any move would require broad FOMC buy-in before it takes effect.
-
How many FOMC meetings does the Fed hold each year today?
The Federal Reserve currently holds eight scheduled FOMC meetings per year, each typically paired with a policy statement and a press conference from the Chair.
-
What would happen if the Fed cut meetings to six per year?
Markets would get fewer rate decisions, fewer dot plot updates, and fewer press conferences to recalibrate expectations, which would slow the pace of formal Fed communication and increase the weight of every remaining signal.
-
Would changing the meeting cadence be dovish or hawkish?
It is a process change, not a rate path change. Fewer meetings reduce the surface area for surprise moves in either direction and can be read as either reducing policy friction or delaying responsiveness, depending on the macro backdrop.
-
Can the Fed Chair change the meeting schedule alone?
No. The chair sets the agenda but changes to the meeting calendar require agreement from the broader FOMC, which is why this story reads as a preference signal rather than an imminent policy shift.
CoinDesk
Crypto News
Altcoin Daily
CryptoSlate
TheBlock
Benjamin Cowen
WatcherGuru