Mike Selig, speaking publicly on the SEC's recent posture toward the crypto industry, said the prior administration deliberately used the regulator as a tool against digital asset firms rather than as a neutral enforcement body. The characterisation echoes a growing consensus among crypto-native legal observers who documented a surge in enforcement actions and staff guidance letters during that period.
The comment adds to an ongoing reassessment of how the agency's mandate was applied — and what a recalibrated SEC stance could mean for projects that have been operating under legal uncertainty for years.
Frequently asked questions
-
What specific actions did the prior SEC administration take against crypto firms?
The prior SEC administration reportedly increased enforcement actions and issued staff guidance letters targeting digital asset firms.
-
How might a recalibrated SEC stance affect existing crypto projects?
A recalibrated SEC stance could provide clarity and potentially alleviate legal uncertainties for projects operating under the previous administration's policies.
WatcherGuru
CryptoSlate
TheBlock
WuBlockchain
Crypto News